[tt] Interview with the British man who designed the Anonymous (V for Vendetta) mask, what he thinks of how it’s being used
<eugen at leitl.org> on
Thu Oct 27 16:01:01 CEST 2011
(not our usual fare, allright)
Interview with the British man who designed the Anonymous (V for Vendetta)
mask, what he thinks of how it’s being used
David Lloyd, British comic artists says the mask he designed is now a
'universal symbol of resistance to any group opposing perceived tyranny' and
that there is 'no shortage of tyrannical powers to express opposition to in
the world' - and on the perceived irony in wearing the mask which contributes
to the profits of Time Warner group - 'It has a degree of irony but it's
hardly an issue. And I'm no fan of corporation-bashing - it's thick-ear
simplification, when what we need is reasonable political discussion.'
3:57 pm, October 26, 2011 in Culture, Politics
Anonymous Mask V for Vendetta
The man behind the now (in)famous ‘anonymous’ mask is in fact David Lloyd –
who started working in comics in the late 1970s, drawing for Halls of Horror,
TV Comic and a number of Marvel UK titles. With writer Steve Parkhouse, he
created the pulp adventure character Night Raven. Dez Skinn set up Warrior
magazine in 1982, he asked Lloyd to create a new pulp character. David Lloyd
and writer Alan Moore created V for Vendetta, a dystopian adventure featuring
a flamboyant anarchist terrorist fighting against a future fascist
government. Lloyd, who illustrated in cinematic chiaroscuro, devised V’s Guy
Fawkes-inspired appearance and suggested that Moore avoid captions, sound
effects and thought balloons.
We asked David about where the inspiration from the mask came from, what is
was designed to represent, what he thinks of how it’s being used now – and on
the perceived irony which was first picked up on by The New York Times back
in August – where they ran a piece exposing how it buying the mask ‘aids the
profits’ of multinational corporation Time Warner.
Where did inspiration for the mask come from?
Our basic character was an urban guerilla fighter against a tyranny, but we
needed him to be more theatrical and flamboyant and eccentric. It had been
established that he would be an escapee from a medical experiment lab and
mentally affected by that, so the craziness of having him adopt the persona
the costume and the mission of the historic thwarted revolutionary, Guy
Fawkes, seemed like a good way of giving us what we wanted for V. It was an
insane brainstorm of mine that just fit into to what we needed. And I wanted
his mask to be an ordinary one you could get in any store around November the
5th but we created V in the Summer so I couldn’t get one anywhere, so I
invented my own.
What was the mask originally designed to represent?
A resurrected Guy Fawkes.
What is the meaning behind the expression on the mask?
The smile was an accident caused by my memory of the moustache on the regular
masks that I couldn’t find. But it was a happy accident. Meaning? Resonance,
more. Smile on the face of the tiger. Smile in the face of adversity. Smile
though your heart is aching. Laugh and the world laughs with you. Immovable,
Why do you think the mask has become so popular since it’s first use in a
protest against scientology on 2008 – what is it about the mask that makes it
so appealing amongst those in the global protest movement?
The character of V is an Everyman who represents individualism in the face of
conformist mass submission to authority, and – in the movie – became a united
front of individuals resisting oppression, so the mask is a useful symbol to
use to represent such rebellion against any perceived tyranny.
What do you think those who wear it in anti-establishment/anti-capitalist
demonstrations see the mask as symbolising – and does it differ from what it
was originally created to represent?
As answered above, but I don’t know how many of the protestors have seen both
the book and the movie or just one of them, so what they individually feel
the mask signifies for them perhaps varies, but I’d guess that’s not to too a
Why do you think they feel the need to hide behind such a mask – why do they
use it? Some might say ’…surely if they truly believed in their aims they
wouldn’t feel the need to hide behind a mask’?
It’s a placard – a banner – a symbol that unites them behind one universal
message, a message not available and as flexible or as powerful as might be
similarly used if it were an actual banner or similar.
Anonymous Mask Occupy London
When did you personally first become aware of its widespread use and what do
you think sparked it all off?
Can’t recall – but the movie sparked it off, I’m certain, perhaps in concert
with the more profound message of the book, which found buyers amongst those
movie-goers and others who were introduced to it later on. The book on it’s
own would not have produced such an influence, although I say that with
sadness because the medium I work in deserves much wider recognition and
respect for the power it has to reach people. The reason it doesn’t get it’s
due in that regard is because most of it’s best product never reaches an
audience as widespread as a general movie-going one.
What do you personally think of its use by groups like ‘anonymous’ and also
Fine. Like I said it’s a universal symbol of resistance to any group opposing
any perceived tyranny. And there is no shortage of tyrannical powers to
express opposition to in this world.
Do you see it as ‘ironic’ that the mask is worn in anti-capitalist,
anti-establishment or pro-piracy demonstrations, yet a share of the profit on
sales of the official licenced mask goes to Time Warner? Is this an issue?
It has a degree of irony but it’s hardly an issue. And I’m no fan of
corporation-bashing – it’s thick-ear simplification, when what we need is
reasonable political discussion.
What do you think of the use of the mask as a ‘universal symbol of resistance
to any group opposing any perceived tyranny’, of what it represents now, and
of David Lloyd’s responses?
More information about the tt