[tt] Black holes from the LHC could survive for minutes
Eugen Leitl
<eugen at leitl.org> on
Fri Jan 23 14:14:01 CET 2009
(Do they have to follow the Thrice Upon a Time script down to the
letter?)
----- Forwarded message from the physics arXiv blog <howdy at arxivblog.com> -----
From: the physics arXiv blog <howdy at arxivblog.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 13:09:42 +0000
To: eugen at leitl.org
Subject: the physics arXiv blog
[1]the physics arXiv blog
[2]Black holes from the LHC could survive for minutes
Posted: 22 Jan 2009 09:49 PM PST
lhc-black-holes
There is absolutely, positively, definitely no chance of the LHC
destroying the planet when it eventually switches on some time later
this year. Right?
Err, yep. And yet a few niggling doubts are persuading some scientists
to run through their figures again. And the new calculations are
throwing up some surprises.
One potential method of destruction is that the LHC will create tiny
black holes that could swallow everything in their path including the
planet. In 2002, Roberto Casadio at the Universita di Bologna in Italy
and a few pals reassured the world that this was not possible because
the black holes would decay before they got the chance to do any
damage.
Now they're not so sure. The question is not simply how quickly a
mini-black hole decays but whether this decay always outpaces any
growth.
Casadio have reworked the figures and now say that: " the growth of
black holes to catastrophic size does not seem possible."
Does not seem possible? That's not the unequivocal reassurance that
particle physicists have been giving us up till now.
What's more, the new calculations throw up a tricky new prediction. In
the past, it had always been assumed that black holes would decay in
the blink of an eye.
Not any more. Casadio and co say: "the expected decay times are much
longer (and possibly $B"d(B 1 sec) than is typically predicted by
other models"
Whoa, let's have that again: these mini black holes will be hanging
around for seconds, possibly minutes?
That doesn't sound good. Anybody at CERN care to clarify?
Ref: [3]arxiv.org/abs/0901.2948: On the Possibility of Catastrophic
Black Hole Growth in the Warped Brane-World Scenario at the LHC
[4][ISMAP:i]
[5][arXivblog?d=41] [6][arXivblog?d=43] [7][arXivblog?i=ijL3Bsrz]
[8][arXivblog?d=50] [9][arXivblog?i=FosnP14d] [10][arXivblog?d=54]
[11][arXivblog?i=512SikBL] [12][arXivblog?d=52]
You are subscribed to email updates from [13]the physics arXiv blog
To stop receiving these emails, you may [14]unsubscribe now. Email
delivery powered by Google
Inbox too full? [15](feed) [16]Subscribe to the feed version of the
physics arXiv blog in a feed reader.
If you prefer to unsubscribe via postal mail, write to: the physics
arXiv blog, c/o Google, 20 W Kinzie, Chicago IL USA 60610
References
1. http://arxivblog.com/
2. http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/arXivblog/~3/QlA4CKvvkdM/
3. http://arxiv.org/abs/0901.2948
4. https://feedads.googleadservices.com/~a/I2oPDqlgurXouZTBFjcDxcQojNA/a
5. http://feeds2.feedburner.com/~f/arXivblog?a=4BId1g4r
6. http://feeds2.feedburner.com/~f/arXivblog?a=0I2z8zXo
7. http://feeds2.feedburner.com/~f/arXivblog?a=ijL3Bsrz
8. http://feeds2.feedburner.com/~f/arXivblog?a=Pnm27oyv
9. http://feeds2.feedburner.com/~f/arXivblog?a=FosnP14d
10. http://feeds2.feedburner.com/~f/arXivblog?a=JeqBRubM
11. http://feeds2.feedburner.com/~f/arXivblog?a=512SikBL
12. http://feeds2.feedburner.com/~f/arXivblog?a=WfVqKHTl
13. http://arxivblog.com/
14. http://feedburner.google.com/fb/a/mailunsubscribe?k=118r9-S4Z0vJg-AkQPASPmDmlGQ
15. http://feeds2.feedburner.com/arXivblog
16. http://feeds2.feedburner.com/arXivblog
----- End forwarded message -----
--
Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://leitl.org">leitl</a> http://leitl.org
______________________________________________________________
ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820 http://www.ativel.com http://postbiota.org
8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A 7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE
More information about the tt
mailing list