[tt] Sergey Brin, Gly2019Ser & a real chance against Parkinson disease/aging! « Pimm - Partial immortalization
Brian Atkins
<brian at posthuman.com> on
Sat Sep 20 00:16:27 CEST 2008
(This is a good side effect of genetic testing. As many more people begin to get
tested as prices drop to nearly nothing we should expect to see much more
interest in solving diseases, and solving them QUICKLY.)
http://pimm.wordpress.com/2008/09/19/sergey-brin-gly2019ser-a-real-chance-against-parkinson-diseaseaging/
It was already known that amongst the Google top people Sergey Brin is the one
who is most interested in pushing biotechnology and the biomedical sciences: in
his Stanford years he was interested in biology courses according to The Google
Story, he married Anne Wojcicki (who graduted from biology at Yale), Google
invested $4.4 million into 23andMe the pioneering personal genomics company
co-founded by Anne, then Google invested into 23andMe competitor Navigenics too.
Now Sergey Brin added another, serious and personal reason to think that he is
really, personally committed to the quick progress in the biomedical sciences:
in his new blog - already a bit of an Internet history - called Too he disclosed
that using the 23andMe personal genetics service he figured out something
worrying about his and his family’s risk of Parkinson disease (his mother and
her aunt are being already diagnosed with PD):
“I learned something very important to me — I carry the G2019S mutation and
when my mother checked her account, she saw she carries it too.
The exact implications of this are not entirely clear. Early studies tend
to have small samples with various selection biases. Nonetheless it is clear
that I have a markedly higher chance of developing Parkinson’s in my lifetime
than the average person. In fact, it is somewhere between 20% to 80% depending
on the study and how you measure.
The G2019S mutation is actually the rs34637584 SNP and lies in the gene LRRK2
encoding leucine-rich repeat kinase on chromosome 12. The mutation affects the
first codon of the gene and is a guanine (G)-to- adenine (A) substitution
resulting known as a missense and leads to a glycine - serine (hence the name)
amino acid conversion in the protein product. Here is how the SNP position looks
in the 23andMe browser using the sample family, the Mendels.
23andMe’s amazingly good corporate blog The Spittoon cited a recent article
about the chances:
The risk of PD for a person who inherits the LRRK2 Gly2019Ser mutation was
28% at age 59 years, 51% at 69 years, and 74% at 79 years.
I am now waiting for the results of my 23andMe test and I think it is better if
humans prepare themselves to make the jump to be curious, rational, balanced and
modestly skeptical about their disclosed genetic information.
I must say that Brin’s attitude and conclusion can be recommended for everybody
facing the same problem but the fact that it is a Google co-founder speaking
here gives us a real chance against Parkinson disease which is really one of the
worst aging related condition as the average age of onset is around 60 years of age.
This leaves me in a rather unique position. I know early in my life
something I am substantially predisposed to. I now have the opportunity to
adjust my life to reduce those odds (e.g. there is evidence that exercise may be
protective against Parkinson’s). I also have the opportunity to perform and
support research into this disease long before it may affect me. And, regardless
of my own health it can help my family members as well as others.
I feel fortunate to be in this position. Until the fountain of youth is
discovered, all of us will have some conditions in our old age only we don’t
know what they will be. I have a better guess than almost anyone else for what
ills may be mine — and I have decades to prepare for it.
So instead of thinking along the boring and impolite New York Times lines:
“Analysts said they did not believe that the news about Mr. Brin would have
a negative impact on Google’s shares.”
let’s just say that the news about one particular nucleotide in Mr Brin’s
chromosome 12 would probably have a long standing and huge positive impact on
the fight against Parkinson disease.
/Here ends logically the original post, what comes after is related to it, but
not strictly, let ask the readers…/
What’s really interesting for me is that this fight against PD directly related
to the other more general fight Sergey mentions as a condition: “Until the
fountain of youth is discovered”.
More than a month ago Aubrey de Grey, Chris Patil and me had a shared Aging and
life extension session in the Googleplex’s Seville Room at the SciFoo
unconference. I had a short 6 slide - 10 min presentation between the 2 other
smart, funny and native speaker guys and I decided to highlight only 1 thing out
of the many-many ideas I have in this field. This only thing was a strategical
one as I tried to answer the question: What can Google do for fixing aging &
life extension? right now technologically and accordingly I suggested something
that only Google can implement concerning its scale and potential. Unfortunately
I didn’t see Sergey or Anne in the audience (they visited probably another
session more interesting to them) but we had a nice audience nevertheless.
The question of what Google can do for curing Parkinson disease or aging might
easily be as important as building a colony on Mars and a NASA Campus. Extension
in time is a deeper problem than extension in space.
Google already made the first steps to the biotech direction by inventing
23andMe/Navigenics. What are the next steps?
This is the first time we are hearing about anything of the health condition of
the Google Founder generation as an issue in itself and as something time
dependent and prone to decay. When Sergey/Larry (and us) are getting older and
older I predict that the thoughts will be more and more on how to fix the
physiological and mental state of the body to preserve work capacity than space
traveling.
Concerning the chances for a robust life extension technology the Google founder
generation is still in the ring, but hasn’t had too much time left to do sg.
before the final knockout.
Earlier I wrote about The life extension bonus effect of personal genome
services which is supposed to be in the range of 10 years today. I would add now
that knowing our predisposed genetic makeup in details is an absolute necessary
but not sufficient step and the only service available at this moment that can
rationally help us to design a substantially longer and safer life.
--
Brian Atkins
Singularity Institute for Artificial Intelligence
http://www.singinst.org/
More information about the tt
mailing list