[tt] the physics arXiv blog
Eugen Leitl
<eugen at leitl.org> on
Sun Jun 1 20:08:31 UTC 2008
----- Forwarded message from the physics arXiv blog <howdy at arxivblog.com> -----
From: the physics arXiv blog <howdy at arxivblog.com>
Date: Wed, 28 May 2008 13:16:04 -0500 (CDT)
To: eugen at leitl.org
Subject: the physics arXiv blog
Reply-To: the physics arXiv blog <howdy at arxivblog.com>
[1]the physics arXiv blog
[2]Friction-free sliding observed in nanoparticles
Posted: 28 May 2008 12:34 AM CDT
[3]Nanofriction
On the atomic scale, friction is a curious beast and explaining
exactly how it arises (and why in certain circumstances it appears to
be absent) has stumped tribologists.
For the growing number of engineers designing and building
nanomachines, one important question is how friction scales with the
contact area between nanoscale components.
In the macroscopic world, this is easy to answer: dry friction is
independent of contact area, according to the second law of friction
developed by the 17th century French scientist Guillame Amonton.
Not so on the nanoscale, say Dirk Dietzel at the University of Münster
in Germany and friends who have spent many happy hours measuring the
force needed to push nanoparticles around using an atomic force
microscope.
And their results are at first glance quite counterintuitive. They say
that in some circumstances the frictional force increases linearly
with surface area. And, get this, in other circumstances friction is
absent entirely.
Friction free sliding is actually predicted between surfaces that are
perfectly smooth, atomically flat and inert. That turns out to be
feasible only for very small surface areas. The evidence for this
effect has been patchy so far so Dietzel';s team can pat themselves on
the back.
More interesting perhaps is their assertion that the frictional forces
they have measured are the result of contamination between
nanosurfaces.
What they're implying is that the problems that many engineers have
with friction on that scale could be solved by reducing contamination.
That's an interesting take. The only trouble is that cleanliness on
the atomic scale is not a simple thing to achieve.
Ref: [4]arxiv.org/abs/0805.2448: Frictional Duality Observed during
Nanoparticle Sliding
[5][arXivblog?i=1XaWEO]
[6][arXivblog?i=uxOwRH] [7][arXivblog?i=6LVBFH]
[8][arXivblog?i=OlCDGh] [9][arXivblog?i=gC09KH]
[10][arXivblog?i=wKsLOh] [11][arXivblog?i=NwHicH]
[12][arXivblog?i=BjTadh] [13][arXivblog?i=QddpsH]
You are subscribed to email updates from [14]the physics arXiv blog
To stop receiving these emails, you may [15]unsubscribe now. Email
Delivery powered by FeedBurner
Inbox too full? [16](feed) [17]Subscribe to the feed version of the
physics arXiv blog in a feed reader.
If you prefer to unsubscribe via postal mail, write to: the physics
arXiv blog, c/o FeedBurner, 20 W Kinzie, 9th Floor, Chicago IL USA
60610
References
1. http://arxivblog.com/
2. http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/arXivblog/~3/299596094/
3. http://arxivblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/05/nanofriction.jpg
4. http://arxiv.org/abs/0805.2448
5. http://feeds.feedburner.com/~a/arXivblog?a=1XaWEO
6. http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/arXivblog?a=uxOwRH
7. http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/arXivblog?a=6LVBFH
8. http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/arXivblog?a=OlCDGh
9. http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/arXivblog?a=gC09KH
10. http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/arXivblog?a=wKsLOh
11. http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/arXivblog?a=NwHicH
12. http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/arXivblog?a=BjTadh
13. http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/arXivblog?a=QddpsH
14. http://arxivblog.com/
15. http://www.feedburner.com/fb/a/emailunsub?id=8632699&key=kesJ612ZsV
16. http://feeds.feedburner.com/arXivblog
17. http://feeds.feedburner.com/arXivblog
----- End forwarded message -----
--
Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://leitl.org">leitl</a> http://leitl.org
______________________________________________________________
ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820 http://www.ativel.com http://postbiota.org
8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A 7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE
More information about the tt
mailing list