[tt] [silk] McKinsey on the economics of solar power
Eugen Leitl
<eugen at leitl.org> on
Tue Aug 19 17:03:31 UTC 2008
----- Forwarded message from Brian Behlendorf <brian at hyperreal.org> -----
From: Brian Behlendorf <brian at hyperreal.org>
Date: Sun, 3 Aug 2008 11:26:46 -0700 (PDT)
To: Silk List <silklist at lists.hserus.net>
Subject: Re: [silk] McKinsey on the economics of solar power
User-Agent: Alpine 1.00 (DEB 882 2007-12-20)
Reply-To: silklist at lists.hserus.net
On Sat, 2 Aug 2008, Udhay Shankar N wrote:
> * Solar energy is becoming more economically attractive as
>technologies improve and the cost of electricity generated by fossil
>fuels rises.
As photo-voltaic improves (efficiency being much less important than cost
per watt) I think it has one big advantage over nearly all other
approaches: no moving parts. Installations of fixed panels can be nearly
maintenance-free when compared to solar thermal, wind, wave power, etc.,
all of which involve components that can break or wear out. The cells I
put on my roof in 2002 were warrantied for 20 years, and even 30 years out
should still be generating 75% of their initial capacity. It's not
completely trouble-free - interconnects can age, inverters/transformers
can blow, lightning and other weather incidents can wreck havoc, but I
predict these to be minor compared to maintaining the machinery to pump
molten sodium through tubes to transfer heat to turbines.
Brian
----- End forwarded message -----
--
Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://leitl.org">leitl</a> http://leitl.org
______________________________________________________________
ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820 http://www.ativel.com http://postbiota.org
8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A 7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE
More information about the tt
mailing list