[tt] Breakthrough on 'safe' human cloning
Hughes, James J.
<James.Hughes at trincoll.edu> on
Tue Apr 15 15:52:28 UTC 2008
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/now-we-have-the-technology-tha
t-can-make-a-cloned-child-808625.html
Independent.co.uk <http://www.independent.co.uk/>
'Now we have the technology that can make a cloned child'
By Steve Connor, Science Editor
Monday, 14 April 2008
A new form of cloning has been developed that is easier to carry out
than the technique used to create Dolly the sheep, raising fears that it
may one day be used on human embryos to produce "designer" babies.
Scientists who used the procedure to create baby mice from the skin
cells of adult animals have found it to be far more efficient than the
Dolly technique, with fewer side effects, which makes it more acceptable
for human use.
The mice were made by inserting skin cells of an adult animal into early
embryos produced by in-vitro fertilisation (IVF). Some of the resulting
offspring were partial clones but some were full clones - just like
Dolly.
Unlike the Dolly technique, however, the procedure is so simple and
efficient that it has raised fears that it will be seized on by IVF
doctors to help infertile couples who are eager to have their own
biological children.
One scientist said this weekend that a maverick attempt to perform the
technique on humans is now too real to ignore. "It's unethical and
unsafe, but someone may be doing it today," said Robert Lanza, chief
scientific officer of American biotechnology company Advanced Cell
Technology.
"Cloning isn't here now, but with this new technique we have the
technology that can actually produce a child. If this was applied to
humans it would be enormously important and troublesome," said Dr Lanza,
whose company has pioneered developments in stem cells and cell
reprogramming.
"It raises the same issues as reproductive cloning and although the
technology for reproductive cloning in humans doesn't exist, with this
breakthrough we now have a working technology whereby anyone, young or
old, fertile or infertile, straight or gay can pass on their genes to a
child by using just a few skin cells," he said.
The technique involves the genetic reprogramming of skin cells so they
revert to an embryonic-like state. Last year, when the breakthrough was
used on human skin cells for the first time, it was lauded by the
Catholic Church and President George Bush as a morally acceptable way of
producing embryonic stem cells without having to create or destroy human
embryos.
However, the same technique has already been used in another way to
reproduce offspring of laboratory mice that are either full clones or
genetic "chimeras" of the adult mouse whose skin cells were
reprogrammed.
The experiments on mice demonstrated that it is now possible in
principle to take a human skin cell, reprogramme it back to its
embryonic state and then insert it into an early human embryo. The
resulting child would share some of the genes of the person who supplied
the skin tissue, as well as the genes of the embryo's two parents.
These offspring are chimeras - a genetic mix of two or more individuals
- because some of their cells derive from the embryo and some from the
skin cell. Technically, such a child would have three biological
parents. Human chimeras occur naturally when two embryos fuse in the
womb and such people are often normal and healthy. Dr Lanza says there
is no reason to believe that a human chimera created by the new
technique would be unhealthy.
Furthermore, studies on mice have shown that it is possible to produce
fully cloned offspring that are 100 per cent genetically identical to
the adult. This was achieved by using a type of defective mouse embryo
with four sets of chromosomes instead of the normal two.
This "tetraploid" embryo only developed into the placenta of the foetus
and when it was injected with a reprogrammed skin cell, the rest of the
foetus developed from this single cell to become a full clone of the
adult animal whose skin was used.
None of the scientists working on cell reprogramming to produce induced
pluripotent stem (iPS) cells - as the embryonic cells are known - plan
to use it for human reproductive medicine. Their main aim is to produce
stem cells for the therapeutic treatment of conditions such as
Parkinson's, Alzheimer's and stroke.
However, Dr Lanza said that the mouse experiments his company had done
demonstrated how easily the technology could be used to produce cloned
or chimeric babies by inserting iPS cells into early human embryos. This
is not banned in many countries, where legislation has not kept pace
with scientific developments.
In Britain, the Human Tissue and Embryos Bill going through Parliament
does not mention the iPS technique, although experts believe that the
new law should make it illegal because it involves genetic modification
of cells that become part of the embryo.
"In addition to the great therapeutic promise demonstrated by this
technology, the same technology opens a whole new can of worms," Dr
Lanza said.
"At this point there are no laws or regulations for this kind of thing
and the bizarre thing is that the Catholic Church and other traditional
stem-cell opponents think this technology is great when in reality it
could in the end become one of their biggest nightmares," he said. "It
is quite possible that the real legacy of this whole new programming
technology is that it will be introducing the era of designer babies.
"So for instance if we had a few skin cells from Albert Einstein, or
anyone else in the world, you could have a child that is say 10 per cent
or 70 per cent Albert Einstein by just injecting a few of their cells
into an embryo," he said.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://postbiota.org/pipermail/tt/attachments/20080415/034855a3/attachment.htm
More information about the tt
mailing list