[tt] Frank Forman, Cochlear Cyborg, update for 2007.10.14

[Premise Checker]

Frank Forman, Cochlear Cyborg, update for 2007.10.14

Monday (September 24): Sound and Beyond: I brought in the Fone Adapter and, 
as I had hoped, the often rather loud sounds that come on when nothing is 
going on, mostly disappeared. And there were no fractured pure tones. 
Still, my scores were not higher for the tones, but I was tired. They were 
higher all but one of the six word discrimination exercises. Next time I'm 
not only not going to ask for repeats but to close my eyes so I don't 
eagerly listen to the sounds so as to figure out what to listen carefully 
for, like "grasshopper, panther, baboon, or polar bear." I can often tell 
just by the number of syllables, but sometimes I'm fooled.

I TTYed to Advanced Bionics to ask about how the Fone Adapter works. I will 
be getting an e-mail from their technical department.

Art Museum: Wandered in to a talk. This time I heard very well, but only by 
using my MONSTER directional microphone. Andrea said I wouldn't need it, 
that the small clip-on omnidirectional microphone would work jes' fine. I 
knew better, since I had been using one with my old hearing aids ever since 
I got them, maybe twenty years ago, and found that a directional mike works 
much better. There's no need to buy new hearing aids, since when you send 
them back to the factory for repair, it usually just chucks them and gives 
you brand new ones. I learned this when I worked at Vicon Instrument Co. 
during two Summers between academic years in college. This was 1964 and 
1965. It would often keep the old case and replace the mike or receiver, if 
that the was the case, or the innards. I think I got a new case, too, with 
my Oticon behind-the-ear aids. My audiologist, Carolyn Wyatt, was in on 
this secret, and kept telling me that digital aids aren't powerful enough 
for my hearing loss. She recommended my looking into a cochlear transplant, 
and that is how you come to be reading this.

Still, I must pay attention to what the docent at the art museum is saying! 
My mind does tend to wander. Discipline! Discipline!

I forgot to mention that there was actually something of interest on Jim 
Lehrer last Friday. It had to do charges against a firm that made 
bullet-proof vests for the military that they performed worse than those of 
an competitor. Both the military and the contractor denied the charges but 
neither were "available for interview." The competitors were most 
available. While not philosophically acceptable, my working epistemology is 
that the parties that stop arguing back have something to hide and are 
wrong. This is far from infallible, else I'd have to conclude that the 
Cathars were correcting in thinking that there was a divine spark within 
each of us just because they were persecuted by the Roman Catholics during 
the Albegensian Crusade starting in 1208? The persecution is 
understandable, for the Cathars had no need of Roman Catholic priests, but 
this does not make their views correct!

Thursday (September 27): No reply yet from Advanced Bionics. Nothing of 
note, except more training with Sound and Beyond. The tunes are coming back 
a lot in between actual sounds made by the program. I'm not sure what the 
pattern is. I decided yesterday to go ahead and cover my eyes before I make 
choices in the Word Discrimination and Music tests. The scores went down a 
little, as expected, but I'm practically perfect on these tests now and 
will probably drop them altogether. Hmmm, ten of us Echols scholars lived 
together after our first year in Lile House, I put a not very flattering 
photograph of myself on the bookcase in our common room. I had clipped a 
newspaper headline saying, "Practically Perfect," and placed it diagonally 
across the upper left hand corner of the flyer the photograph came it. No 
one defaced it, but it did often get turned upside down. It was next to the 
World's Most Quiet Clock I described on April 20. I also had my 
contribution to modern art, a painting I did in 1960, called "Civil War." 
Half was blue and half was gray. Standing alone, it makes no less sense 
than many paintings in modern art museums. (I have a little essay on this, 
as I do take modern art seriously.) This masterpiece is lost forever to the 
world, I am afraid. It too got turned upside down a lot. One should think 
that the artist himself would know the proper orientation of his works! But 
then again, one would also think that a manufacturer's catalog would be the 
definitive source for catalog numbers. This is just not true, as I gave an 
example of a clear error in my, "Acoustic Chamber Music Sets (1899-1926): A 
Discography," _Journal of the Association for Recorded Sound Collections_, 
in three parts: Vol. 30, Nos. 2 and 3 (2000) and Vol. 31, No. 1 (2001), now 
in the public domain, at http://www.panix.com/~checker/acch.htm. There have 
been notorious cases of a modern art museum's hanging a painting upside 
down, but I know of no museum, when pointed out the mistake by the artist, 
insisted it was right.

After the fifteenth run through all 14 Sound and Beyond exercises, I took a 
comprehensive test again for the third time. Improvements on 12, 
substantially so for Environmental Sounds bzw. for picking out musical 
instruments (56% -> 76% bzw. 72% -> 94%). In some cases I am "practically 
perfect" and variations now are just "experimental errors," as in the case 
of the engineer who declared that all odd numbers are prime: 1 is, 
arguably, prime. 3,5,7,9,11,13. That proves it. What about 9? That was an 
experimental error.

Now am I really, really expected to tell the difference between the sounds 
of a windstorm and wind whistling? I think I'll test it out on Sarah and 
Greg, since I can play these sounds myself by using a nifty file manager 
called Power Desk. You can get this from http://v-com.com. I recommend even 
more its System Suite, which features not only computer management clean-up 
tools but various malware, adware, spyware, and virus catchers but also a 
firewall.

  .....

Greg came up, and we tried all the 64 syllables from the 32 spondaic words. 
I can't really tell whether I'm improving, since we haven't worked out a 
rigorous and standardized test. I showed him my iSong of Glenn Gould 
playing back and the Sound and Beyond exercises. Even he misses some of the 
items at the highest levels of difficulty. This goes to show that "normal" 
hearing is quite varied, as I remarked on my entry for April 20.

I went to Rodman's drug store to getting a new WalkWoman. It's always so 
hard figuring out just what went bad, but this time I determined that it my 
old WalkWoman wore out. So I purchased a jwin Model no. JX832A 
FM/AM/cassette for a mere $7.88. It didn't work. The button to press when 
running a tape wouldn't stay down. So back to the store. I opened another 
one. It didn't work either. I was about to keep opening them till I found 
out one that did work, whereupon the sales lady wondered whether I had a 
bad battery. This turned out to be the case! This cheap model, made in Red 
China, works just as well as the much more expensive ones I have been 
buying at RadioSnack. I always buy warranties for WalkWomen, figuring on 
the cost per year of owning them. Otherwise, I don't get them, except on 
equipment that has a blue light display. These wear out. I took in a 
dual-CD stand alone burner for my stereo (not my computer) back just before 
the three-year warranty was up to BestBuy and was given a fresh one, 
replete with *its* three-year warranty. It cost me less than nothing, for I 
chose an open floor model and got a refund. I don't know whether I'll be 
able to repeat the experience in another three years. But $7.88 is so cheap 
that I'll just give them the HEAVE when they wear out.

I wasn't able to hear very well on the walk from the subway to home, 
though, but my hearing is so variable that I didn't think I had a defective 
model.

Friday (September 28): Well, I did hear pretty well out jogging the next 
morning. I was still working through my tapes of Glenn Gould's Bach and 
thought a violin sonata was being played. I didn't want to look at the 
label on the cassette, the better to try to tell what was being played. It 
was my remembrance that a violin sonata was coming on. But it sounded like 
a cello sonata, and so it was when I finished my jogg and looked.

All My Children: Zach wants to keep Fusion going for his wife, Kendall, 
even though they think Greenlee won't leave. She's a self-centered pest. 
Meanwhile, J.R., Adam's son, wants to start up a "beauty network."

Jim Lehrer: nothing I can remember. I didn't jot down any notes.

Tuesday (October 2): I missed telling jello apart from jelly on the food 
section of the Word Discrimination module. I missed another one, too. I've 
gotten all the food choices right only one. Today I got all the animals 
right for the first time. I've gotten all the color items right once, 
family four times, number thrice, and time five times. All this out of 
sixteen sessions. I've decided to continue with these exercises, which I 
now make hard by not looking at the choices until after I hear them and 
never replaying them. I still want to improve on my ability to guess what 
the word is before choosing one out of four. This is, after all, what 
normal people do.

The choices are supposedly chosen by chance, and this is the first time 
I've seen this jello vs. jelly choice. Likewise for windstorm and wind 
whistling yesterday. The answers aren't so random. There is a significantly 
greater chance that the answer to the next question will be in the same 
place, cursor-wise, as the answer to the current one. I exploit this fact 
to get a higher score. My cheating doesn't matter, since it's my own 
*improvements* that count, if you discount my improved ability to cheat. 
There is a fair amount of learning on these tests. I've sometimes tell 
which of three is the odd woman out, not by noting different vowels or 
different consonants but by noticing that one takes less (or more) time 
than the other two.

Wednesday (October 3): A lot of my training hour today consisted of 
listening to the files themselves. I never hear the tune "We Wish You" in 
the Music Appreciation module, but it is probably followed by the word "a 
merry Christmas and a Happy New Year."

We went to a short ceremony at George Mason to greet the new faculty for 
the law school and the economics department. There was a noticeable 
improvement in my hearing over the last time I was there. Even so, there's 
quite a long way to go.

Thursday (October 4): I hit two new highs, 96% for environment sounds and 
88% for vowel recognition. And I decided to move up to Level 2 for 
male/female identification. It was just male vs. female at level 1. Now 
it's either high vs. low male or high vs. low female. The new comparisons 
seem easier to me, or at least today I went through them quickly, but my 
score dropped from 98% to 88%. It will pick up, I am sure.

Friday (October 5):

Jogging: I didn't have my cyber ear connected as I went jogging and hear 
the opening of Beethoven's Third Sonata (Schnabel) sounding exactly right! 
At last, back to how I used to be able to listen to music. Alas, it didn't 
last.

All My Children: Just that the various parties are on the outlook for the 
evil brother. I eschewed looking at the captions for the various other 
story lines. Jim Lehrer: nothing at all memorable.

Saturday (October 6): iSong: I'm pleased to report that I can follow the 
rising notes actually rising. The first half of the first measure goes like 
this:

At the start: C8 (middle C), a half note, held for the entire half measure
A quarter note later: E8, a quarter note that continues to the end of the 
half measure
An eighth note after that: G8 for an eighth note
An eighth note after that: C9 for an eighth note
An eighth note after that: E9 for an eighth note
An eighth note after that: G8 for an eighth note
An eighth note after that: C9 for an eighth note
An eighth note after that: E9 for an eighth note

The second half of the measure repeats the first half.

The second measure uses C8,D8,A8,D9,F9 in the same way.
The third measure goes B7,D8,G8,D9,F9
The fourth is C8,E8,G8,C9,E9, same as the first measure.
The fifth is C8,E8,A8,E9,A9.
The sixth is C8,D8,E#8,A8,D9

and on and on till the last two measures.

Sunday (October 7). I went on a 10-mile jog, listened to the Berlioz 
Requiem, my third favorite vocal work (behind Brahms. German Requiem, no. 
1, and Beethoven's Missa Solemnis, no. 2. To think, the two greatest 
products of Western Christendom were written by an agnostic (Brahms) and a 
sometime pantheist (Beethoven)! I heard it only poorly, though.

Tuesday (October 9). Listening to Schnabel's Beethoven this time was a 
major improvement. The notes don't go up and down the scales, but I did a 
good job of keeping my place in the score. I mean my memory of the music, 
as I didn't have an actual score in front of me. I am getting back in 
communion with the gods!

Wednesday (October 10): Not so good with Beethoven this time. Too many 
tunes in my cyber-ear whenever the music got soft. These were not 
countertunes so much as noise.

Sound and Beyond: I missed Cheese She's Cheese in the consonant module, 
which I certainly should have gotten. (I missed another one, too.) I've 
been making jokes about Cheez-Whiz to Roy for years and years now. He was 
starting to be a connoisseur of cheese, and I told him that Cheez Whiz was 
just as good as far I am concerned. We would joke that this substance must 
have been used in Egyptian tombs, since it would never decay. We would make 
up many jokes to each other about this remarkable substance. Once when 
visiting him in Colorado, he had a jar waiting for him, much to the 
distress of his wife, Anne, who thought it was bad for his arteries. So, we 
made up new jokes about how Cheez Whiz is the best sealant ever made by 
man, but we also speculated about its roll during the Big Bang. I have kept 
adding such imaginary concoctions that they have been collectively dubbed 
Formanisms. My children were raised on a whole bunch of them. The first, I 
think, was the nasty little man. Originally, he was a tailor at a 
haberdashy in Georgetown where I bought a suit, to which he claimed he was 
unable to add a watch pocket for. I have resented this ever since. The 
nasty little man expanded from this poor tailor to being responsible for 
anything bad happening. In due course, he was supplemented by the Nice Big 
Woman, who did just the opposite. It made for good humor, for whenever I 
was missing something and thought one of the girls had run off with it, I 
wouldn't go accusing them but asked them if they saw the nasty little man 
snatch it away. Not entirely infrequently, the object would come back, and 
I would thank the Nice Big Woman for returning the object in front of them.

Word Discrimination: This time I am guessing what the word is. Then I look 
and choose. There are 25 questions in each section.

Animals: I correctly guessed only 10 before looking. One was chinchilla. 
Now I'd never have gotten that one, had I not seen it many times on the 
test. I saw llama for the first time, but I didn't guess it. I actually 
missed only one after seeing the choices.

Animals: blind 10, seeing 24
Food: blind 10, seeing 22
Color: blind 9, seeing 24
Family: blind 17, seeing all 25
Number: blind 14, seeing 23
Time: blind 15, seeing all 25.

This may be tedious to read through! I had sensed that I was pretty high up 
on family values, though this exercise has words like ex-wife and divorcee. 
It seemed that trying to guess the word before seeing four I could choose 
from had made me miss some questions. But it doesn't seem to have. I missed 
only 6 out of 150 anyhow. I'll stick with this some more, to get my blind 
guesses higher.

I've wondered whether I'm improving with time anyhow and that Sound and 
Beyond doesn't make a difference. No. No. No. Time does not and cannot 
cause anything! This is important not just to realize but to keep 
uppermind. A change can only be explained by a change. Never explain, say, 
the decline in morals by saying that there are immoral people out there. 
This is a constant. If there has been an increase in their numbers, only 
then do we have the beginning of an explanation. I can think of many 
examples and am quick to jump on people by insisting that time itself is 
not a causal agent.

What I mean here is that other training is doing improving my hearing or 
that not even deliberate training is working but rather that my brain is 
continually working to bring my hearing back into line with reality, such 
that it is, but it isn't, that a normal person has. Processes I am unaware 
of can be working also. But it would be very hard to measure the 
effectiveness of Sound and Beyond, teevee watching, struggling to overhear, 
or iSong each and separately. It is a universal problem, teasing out 
separate causations. Sometimes one just has to rely on one's judgment, but 
that is so often terribly flawed, even the judgment of experts (who are 
very often biased). Still, I must be wary of throwing out objection after 
possible objection to some conclusion I don't want to hear, whether it is 
against my interests, require a major overhaul of my belief system, or 
damage friendships.

One thing I was surprise to learn. We all know about paradigms and how 
normal science keeps merrily grinding away in full-dress bureaucratic mode 
until so many anomalies keep piling up that a new paradigm gets born that 
explains the anomalies. Thus, the celebrated thesis of Thomas Kuhn's The 
Structure of Scientific Revolution, which book I have not read but seem to 
know by heart anyway. As it turns out, revolutions are only partial but, 
moreover, anomalies are generally recognized as such only after a new 
paradigm is already there. Thus, the fact that gravitational and inertial 
mass measured the same wasn't regarded a serious matter until the general 
theory of relativity came along to explain it. I have a great article about 
this from _Science_, which I think I can dig out an e-mail to anyone 
wanting it.

Thursday (October 11). I decided to watch my two programs, for I was at 
home on vacation and Sarah was gone. Better to watch them today than 
tomorrow, when she might be here. She disdains All My Children no end. Big 
scene in the courtroom where Annie's evil brother, Richard ("Richie") 
Novak, is allowed to live wherever he wants. Annie and her husband, Ryan, 
are afraid he will come upset them. Jim Lehrer: some stuff about Doris 
Lessing, who got the Nobel Prize for literature but whose celebrated 
_Golden Notebooks_ I had never gotten around to buying to put on a stack of 
unread books. I doubt I'll get around to it, ever. It was announced that my 
favorite presidential candidate, Ron Paul, would be interviewed on Friday.

Friday (October 12). Sarah came back just before AMC came on, and I 
suggested that I make this another teevee day and not an iSong day. I told 
her about Ron Paul, and she said go ahead. Naturally, I wanted to find out 
what Richie would do. I most definitely do not want to become an AMC 
addict, but I had an excuse this once. Ryan packs a rod. [Commercial 
break.] Did I mention that he wasn't the one, a few Fridays ago that Annie 
saw was in the morgue? [Stay tuned for the next episode.] Annie tells him 
to come over and talk, that Ryan will be away for the evening. He does and 
they forgive each other. But later Richie threatens to take out seven years 
from her life, like she did by lying on the witness stand, resulting in his 
being incarcerated for seven years. (During all this, Kendall wants to see 
Greenlee, who badly wants to amend their friendship, and they do so. Much 
of the current shows are given over to pests who won't go away. I may act 
this way myself at times. Also, Kendall is fearful about getting Sparkie a 
cochlear implant, and Zach tries to reassure her. It's been eight months 
since I got mine, and I'm not convinced that the operation will have 
improved my hearing after all, esp. for music, but still quite hopeful. 
I'll have to try to make some calculations with Sound and Beyond to see if 
the *rate* of progress is keeping up, but this will not just be a matter of 
using simple formulas, for reasons I ought to elaborate.) Well, Ryan comes 
home early and threatens Richie. Annie grabs his pistol. Ryan takes it back 
and fires it, hitting Annie. [Stay tuned for the next episode.]

Jim Lehrer: A good interview with Ron Paul, which I have downloaded from 
the PBS site. Lots of stuff about Algore and his Nobel Prize. David Brooks 
points out that Algore shouldn't run for the presidency, since global 
warming is 13th on the list of voter concerns. I am in favor of it, since 
it means few days when the roads are icy when I am out jogging. Now others 
are horrified when I say this, since I should be concerned with the public 
good when I think about public policy. I say I should vote my interests, on 
the hopeful theory that the voting process will come to represent the 
interests of the median voter. (It comes closer to representing the median 
pressure group member, for whose benefits are concentrated, whereas the 
costs to unorganized voters are diffused. The better solution is to limit 
the scope of government, but that is too subtle an idea for the electorate. 
I have just found a piece from Physorg, " Anthropologist finds cultural 
emphasis on group over individual might hinder democracy," but I haven't 
read it yet.

A recap on my listening to music at home just for my own enjoyment. I like 
Gould playing the WTC the most, just for his staccato chirping away. One 
friend remarked that all the pianists I like "sound just like Gould." I 
finished that, then the 1955 Goldbergs. I reported listening to Ralph 
Kirkpatrick, harpsichord, but I listened to only four discs of the eight in 
the "complete" DG repackage. He can make contrasts with a double-keyboard 
harpsichord that Gould can't do on a single-keyboard piano. I strongly 
suspect he knew about Gunnar Johanson's 43 home produced discs of every 
single Schmieder klavier work of Bach, mostly on a double-keyboard *piano* 
of his own manufacture, though Gould apparently never contacted him. There 
were lots of contradictions between the labels on the discs, the inserts 
with each disc, and the table of contents for the whole set, but with a 
copy of Wolfgang Schmieder, _Thematisches-Systematisches Verzeichnis der 
Musikalisches Werke von Johann Sebastian Bach_, which I got for a mere $15 
in 1965 and which is quite well worn, I was able to straighten the 
contradictions out. It's good to have the works that scholars regard as 
doubtful or spurious, disagreeing among themselves. Only one source credits 
Bach to the Fantasy in a, S. 922, but that was enough excuse for Christiane 
Wuyts to put it in her 3-CD set of "Unrecorded Works" OF JSB. I don't think 
it's genuine Bach, and Schmieder and The New Grove doubt it, too. But it's 
a dramatic piece and not "unrecorded," Alfred Brendel recorded it in 
stereo, and Reine Gianoli, my very favorite lady pianist, recorded it in 
mono for Westminster. There were quite a few other pieces in this set that 
were recorded by other than Johansen, too.

Then I have relistened to the Mozart sonatas, played by Bob Silverman, two 
discs at a time, interspliced with the unaccompanied violin works (Szigeti) 
and the Shostakovich Preludes and Fugues (Keith Jarrett, the jazz musician, 
whom I prefer to any of the Russians, maybe because he "sounds like Gould." 
Check out his two-CD set of Mozart Concerti, to hear them in a refreshingly 
different manner. Too bad Benny Goodman insisted on being a good classical 
musician when playing the Mozart works. He was okay, but boy I'd love to 
hear a jazz rendition!) I did not dig into the music very well, I'm afraid 
to continue to have to report and didn't even pick up the characteristic 
Shostakovich often biting style. I was at the computer when Mozart's 14th 
sonata ended and No. 16 (old no. 15) in C, K. 545 came one. I didn't even 
notice it, though I've reported on giving it concentrated listenings 
several months ago. I later pulled out the score and was able to follow it 
quite well, though I didn't recognize what I was listening to very well. A 
little while after that, when I sat down for a pipe and reading, I put it 
on again, and now I could follow the music, albeit with the notes not 
subjectively corresponding to what they used to sound like and what they 
are in the score. I followed though the rhythm.

It's progress, I am convinced. Next up is the organ music of Bach (Walcha, 
of course). I'll see (HEAR) how it goes, for organs are much more dense 
than pianos. I'll also be trying Gould's only organ recording (Nos. 1-9 of 
the Art of the Fugue). Will he "sound like Gould"? I am eager to find out, 
but a good dose of Walcha first.

Sunday (October 14):

My computer is getting invaded every few minutes from 207.177.3.8 and 
207.177.3.9, but I can't connect to the site to find out what it is, nor 
does googling them render anything that I can understand, except the words 
spyware and adware.

Between 12:05 pm and 12:55 pm I got invaded 90 times! Nothing till 1:43 pm. 
Then 10 more invasions until 1:47. It started up again at 2:27 and has been 
roaring since. (This is on Sunday October 19, as I am getting caught up on 
my writing.) Alas, further research, using http://whois.uwhois.com reveals 
that my home computer, which is provided by RCN.com, the parent company of 
both Starpower and Erols, has been assigned the whole block 207.172.0.0 - 
207.172.255.255 and it was kindly doing the blocking, IF it did the 
blocking. I don't know where the "major" invasion came from. I'll just have 
to take the word of my firewall on the V-Com systems suite [renamed 
Avanquest Systems Suite, and when I started several years ago Fix-It 
Utilities].

Basically, I don't understand what is going on.

iSong: I decided, instead of starting with the full score and working down 
to more and more simplified versions, to do the opposite, It looks like I 
just might be able to really recognize the highest version, namely Mr. 
Gould himself playing and as I remember it, this way.

I been listening to the Bach organ works for pleasure (such that it is) 
now, but my identification is slight. I can get into the famous Toccata and 
Fugue in d, B.W.V. 565, fairly well, since I know the work esp. well. Not 
very well at all for the T&F in F, S. 540, the other T&F in d ("Dorian"), 
S. 538, or the F&F in g, S. 542. I listen to them on my WalkWoman once a 
year, but I don't know them quite as well. I know much better the Toccata, 
Adagio, and Fugue in C, S. 564, and I have reported on listening to that 
with my cyber ear several times some months ago. I did it with the score 
twice. Hard to follow. I used both ears, the better to hear the notes 
played on the pedal. I almost always follow the score through keeping up 
with the lowest notes, since that's where I used to hear the best. Now I'm 
aiming at following the score in the highest notes. But, by having the 
pedal notes ring in my meat ear, I can use those notes also to keep track 
of the music. The toccata opens with the hands. Only in the eighth measure 
is there a (single) note played on the pedal. Again a single pedal note in 
the tenth and twelfth measures. Then the pedal alone for nearly nineteen 
measures. Then lots of flurry with hands and feet. Then sometimes measures 
with just one pedal note, a great way of keeping track. However, my cyber 
ear does not register the pedal notes differently, not yet. I thought I was 
following the score pretty well, except that it ran out much too soon. Same 
failure to keep up in the adagio interlude. I kept track of the entrance of 
the tema fugatum okay in the fugue, but still didn't keep up. Oddly, when I 
unplugged my meat ear and listened with my cyber ear alone, I kept up with 
the score better. Or was this only because it was a second go around.

It will be fun, and instructive and helpful to my hearing, to come back to 
my favorite organ work. I plan once a week.

Still no word from Advanced Bionics on what makes the telephone adapter 
eliminate most of the squeal. It sells a patch cord for $30 that is to be 
used between an audio source and the behind-the-ear models of the sound 
processor. I think it's the same as this, which I spotted at RadioSnack on 
Thursday:

RadioSnack: 6.56-Ft. Attenuating Dubbing Cord with 1/8" Phone Plugs
Model: 42-2152  |  Catalog #: 42-2152
$4.99
http://www.radioshack.com/product/index.jsp?parentPage=search&summary=summary&techSpecs=techSpecs&currentTab=techSpecs&cp=&custRatings=custRatings&features=features&accessories=accessories&productId=2103841&support=support&tab=summary

Record from a line-level output with our 6.56-foot attenuating dubbing 
cord. It connects the earphone jack from a radio, cassette or CD player to 
a recorder's input or mic jack via 1/8" phone plugs on each end.